Seperation of church and state
44 people remixing
Invite people to remix with you!
or
-
@Anonymous: The Joker didn't appear in Detective Comics issue #1, so your entire point is invalid.
1 -
Anonymous
@burrowowl: I'm sorry, Batman #1. My bad. I'm a Marvel guy.
-
@Anonymous: Right or wrong, killing Bin Laden was overwhelmingly popular in the United States, which is a democratic republic that ostensibly seeks to serve the will of its people. The people wanted him dead. They got him dead and the most popular complaints I've seen are that he didn't die sooner or suffer more.
2 -
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: The irony of this statement, following what else has been said, and the subject matter, is astronomical.
-
@Anonymous: Staring at a wall for the rest of your life with nothing is far more inhumane than being put out of your misery. At that point you cease to exist, there is no more punishment to be had.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: That makes you no better than him. Do you think what he did was without cause?
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: It's bad because he is a human. Every human should be free. His acts on 9/11 should be covered by freedom of speech. But no, America isn't land of the free, it's land of the limited oppression.
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: ....It's scary to think there are people like you walking amongst us. So a foreigner, NOT a citizen of the United States, is entitled to his "freedom of speech", and freedom of speech now apparently also entails blowing up privately owned structures and killing thousands of people in the process? What the fuck makes you think a foreigner is entitled to freedom of speech? That's reserved for American citizens. But KILLING people is now also freedom of speech?
Gee, let me go grab my gun and kill everyone I see for their money, I'm just expressing how desperate I am for money. I'm sure the court will understand I'm just an honest man trying to make a living.
Oh! How about I blow up my neighbors house because it's my freedom of speech to declare how I don't like the fact his lawn is better than mine. No wonder people like you voted for Obama. You have no fucking idea how anything works.
21 1 -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: So you're saying that non-Americans don't have rights and should be slaves? OKAY!!!! :D
And to your shooting thing, yes. You should be allowed to do it. It's your freedom to do so, and telling you that you can't is oppression.
If you took your head out of your conservative ass you'd realize how wrong you are. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I agree with you, but there's a difference between killing someone and telling someone else to do it for you.
It does fall into the area of free speech, if only as a reason free speech shouldn't be unrestricted. Some might say it's an insufficient reason, I'm undecided. -
@Anonymous: I seriously can't tell if your also being sarcastic or if the joke just flew over your head.
Or mine...? -
@AvengerOfBoredom: Boy, you are just balls deep into Ayn Rand aren't you.
It's about more than money. Get rid of the tax policy respecting any marriage if you want, whatever. There are still other important rights which are being given to heteros and denied to homos for no reason other than ignorant people who don't respect them. -
@semicomatose: Look at you try so hard. An "internet intellectual" throwing out the piss poor escapsim acts of all the puppets before you. No my lil morsel. I've never bothered to read Ayn Ran nor will I. I would offer you salvation before you reach for your next few arrows, strawman, ad hominem, etc.
You've made no point, yet you act as if you have. You toss your ballsack around as if it's filled with the fluids of the gods. Yet, you're as limp as eunch in a whore house.
Do you like my tone? It's mirroring your own.
Let me clarify this: Jump into conversation, change the subject, no facts, no details, just spews out attemptive insults, tries to personalize the conversation, then claims people are denying imaginary rights for others while promptly denying the rights of others and calling them ignorant for it. That is an amusing tidbit.
Do go on. It is a rather cool story bro. -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: You're trying to insinuate that a terrorist that wants to destroy this country has the rights of a citizen of this country meanwhile is a citizen of another country and resided in another country at the time of committing these atrocities, whether in first or third person.
EXPLAIN THAT FUCKING HYPOCRISY. Also I'm not a conservative, I hate conservatives, but I suppose the only thing you can comprehend when someone has a dissenting viewpoint to yours. You're one of those radicalist apologists to perpetuate this garbage. I can't even tell if you're trolling because there are people that actually think like you in the world.
You SHOULD be and you are ALLOWED to are two very different things. In your own twisted, warped idea of what the constitution, amendments and other major facets of how our society works, you seem to think that these should be all encompassing ideas that should include breaking the law. Let me guess, you also think Occupy Wall Street is a fabulous display of people fighting for their rights by destroying other people's personal property that have no involvement in the matter, like cars parked on the street of people working 9 to 5 jobs.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I'm neutral to OWS. They should be allowed to do it, but someone should also be allowed to open fire on them and not be arrested.
I'm not an apologist. I don't like 9/11, but it's my own personal belief that every human is born and will die free, and they have their own right to do WHATEVER they want no matter what. You say you're not a conservative, but you obviously do not support freedom. Are you saying those in other countries don't deserve the same freedom as we, as Americans do? The Constitution states "all men are created equal", are you saying a Mexican isn't as good as an American and isn't equal to us? I don't care how you feel about conservatives, but you are one, deal w/ it2 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@AvengerOfBoredom: HUGELY important things being missed here are the right of a spouse to make decisions for their loved ones in emergency medical situations, child custody rights, hospital visitations, etc...
2 -
@Anonymous: Emergency Medical Situations?
Civil Union.
Child Custody Rights?
Civil Union.
Hospital Visitations?
Civil Union.
Etc...
For everything else there's Civil Union.
Your state doesn't recognize a Civil Union?
But the Federal Government does?
Guess you better move to a state where you're not attempting a political statement. -
@AvengerOfBoredom: Since someone will say something else stupid. I'll toss this tidbit of stupidity in to help further the bullshit along.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_and_responsibilities_of_marriages_in_the_United_States
Dollah, Dollah, Dollah, Dollah Bill Ya'all! -
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: That's a bullshit excuse.
You got two legs.
If not, then you got public assistance for being disabled.
For thousands of years mankind has moved by foot ... you can't?
"But my precious belongings!"
Sounds like a matter of convenience.
1st World Problems.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@AvengerOfBoredom: ok, lets go with the hypothetical situation of you abandon your stuff. you sell all of your possessions but you are still in debt. do you walk to another state, if you do what do you eat. then you have to find a job and housing. getting housing requires a deposit, on the low end its $300-$1000. if you are traveling by foot some areas of the country are more hospitable to that than others.
-
Anonymous
@AvengerOfBoredom: Or stay in the state you love and try to use your rights as a citizen of that state to change it. IF the "political statement" you are trying to make is more than just that, IF it's change that you truly believe makes your state a better place. Cause, you know, people are perfectly capable of discerning what is or isn't too important to them to be simply labeled a "political statement" by someone who disagrees or perhaps finds their sincere efforts to be an inconvenience. If it's such an inconvenience, why don't YOU move to another state?
-
@AvengerOfBoredom: ..didn't even insult you. There's nothing wrong with Ayn Rand, or the state of being balls deep into something. I wanted to lead the conversation towards the idea of Civil Union, which you just did anyway. I thought we could get along until you had to be a big poopie about it. You could have been my waifu.
Troll on, brother. -
@semicomatose: mfw claims isn't trying to insult, calls names, then takes the time to say isn't mad, then says can't get along.
As for the other two of you.
Your entire stance is if the people around you dislike you and throw shit at you daily, you should sit there your entire life taking their shit.
Because that's how you wanna live your life.
Not go someplace where you'll be accepted and happy.
But stay there and take the shit because you know the shit really isn't as bad as you're making it out to be.
People have done exactly as has been said ... Why? Because they wanted a better life.
You wanna go to extremes?
Maybe stay awake in History class and learn the immigrants.
Maybe pay attention to how illegal immigrants still come to the USA.
People do it all the time.
An uneducated Mexican can do it ... but by your logic, an educated homosexual cannot.
Those are your words, not mine.
-
@Anonymous: A link to a post that proves the point being said further. Thanks for the help and the bump. Appreciate your efforts brody.
-
Anonymous
@AvengerOfBoredom: last time i checked america was still one country and was founded on the idea of equality. the practice of all people are created equal has been flawed from the beginning. i am still hopeful that we can, as a nation, improve this
1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: >> doesn't even say that, it just says gay sex is a sin. no mention whatsoever of gay sex though. it does, however, say it's unconstitutional in the constitutions of nearly half of the states.
lolol wut? -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: The Constitution doesn't say I can't drive a freight train on a dirt road either.
That doesn't make it possible.1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
