-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Meander_Thralls: It's things like this that support the fact that men are more logical than women.
A guy whose waist is 32 inches around and whose legs are 34 inches long wears a pant size of 32x34. And similar measurements come with a shirt too.
Women wear clothing that is an arbitrary number that has no direct correlation with their body dimensions.3 -
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: Or, it could mean the Department of Commerce is illogical. I feel better stereotyping a Department in the U.S. government than woman - particularly since so many women are much smarter than I am.
1 1 1 1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: Yeah but men's sizing is actually even more confusing. You actually have to add 4" to get the real size. I think saying something is an exact measurement in inches, and it being completely different is even more weird. Honestly, get tailored jeans or measure yourself, your waist will probably be about 4" larger than what your jeans say.
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: I'm not sure if mens sizing is more confusing, but Amy_ is right that mens sizing varies as well, about 3 inches off if we assume these Esquire numbers are representative.
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/mens-fashion/pants-size-chart-090710
Also, why are you hoping her asshole is bleached? Does it taste better then? Inquiring minds want to know.2 -
Anonymous
@Meander_Thralls: When did this place become so fixated upon proving incredibly stupid points?
Does anyone really give a shit if that's true? The only thing that we should be discussing is how disgusting this fat bitch is.1 1 -
-
Anonymous
This is glorious because it is an example of what mother nature can do. You my dear are a mountain without the majestic or the beauty. #justfat #eatsomedonuts #orgetsomeselfcontrol
21 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Meander_Thralls: In any case, my worry is not the argument over which size is beautiful. To me, the problem with *excuse me* fat people is that they take away my appetite when I walk on the street, seeing obese ones with their stomachs hanging out of their shirts or their second chins resting on their saggy chests, as well as the idea that every man out there must like a woman no matter her size. I cannot imagine being in bed with a naked woman who has nothing but jelly rolls. It just isn't sexually appealing to me, and I know there are people out there who do find that attractive. More power to them, but I get the feeling they are a minority for now. Unless, of course, eventually American women will all be above current size 10.
-
@littlewind: I don't know. It's a hard problem. We live in a culture where if everyone ate only 100 calories less, the food industry would lose billions of dollars. Packaged and fast food is all high calorie, low fiber, which makes it difficult to eat enough to maintain low body weight and not feel hungry. Add in the progressive loss of muscle (and metabolism) as we age, and you've got a situation where everyone will likely face a weight problem at some point. So, some people are just going to want to go the easy route and accept the fact that they are fat (and want others to do the same), and there is even some research that suggests being fat is good for you (which I believe is wrong, btw). But, irrespective of whether people find it sexually appealing or not, it's a public health (and personal health) crisis that needs to be addressed.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: WTF happens to the world???, i will love to bang that chick
by the way, I want to make sweet love to Adelle2 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous





