Audio Formats
89 people remixing
Invite people to remix with you!
or
-
Anonymous
@keigen_shu: I think you missed my point.
-
Anonymous
@mayestic: Well, for starters it's your own fault for only having a 200GB hard drive. Space isn't "expensive," you just don't have enough space. Secondly, you're just sacrificing quality for the sake of quantity. That doesn't make your decision intelligent necessarily. Ignoring the sound fidelity you get from FLAC to complain about the size difference is cherry picking.
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I don't believe you have robot ears, enjoy your wasted hard drive space
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@remeranAuthor: I have 2tb, I'm going to have to buy an external hard drive soon.
-
@Anonymous: Oh ya, well I just had Bill Gates himself hand me a Geopbyte extarnal HD so suck it
1 -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Nobody ever said anything about the teenage human ear.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
High quality music belongs to high quality sound systems.
Normal people don't spend as much on a good system, just like a regular dude doesn't need a tuned car, he just wants to go from one place to another. Most people doesn't care about the quality THAT much. Even good headphones on a thing like an iPod won't boost the sound they should. Regular quality is good for a regular equipment or set up.
I'm pretty sure an audiophile won't notice the difference listening with little white ear buds. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I'm talking to the guy who said he'd kill himself without music. Can't tell if you are that guy, but I'm telling him that no one cares about how much he likes music.
-
@Anonymous: I think you misunderstood our posts. We're talking about re-encoding a low bit-rate source. The encoder is taking the 96kbit/s encoded track that is already of low quality, and then trying to encode it again at a higher bit-rate, like 320kbit/s. It will not sound any better than the 96kbit/s version because in lossy codecs information is lost during the process of encoding, and it cannot be recovered by simply re-encoding the low bit-rate version to a higher bit-rate.
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: SWING and a miss. The point was that the average human ear can tell the difference, but your ears can't because you grew up with digital compression and earbuds.
2 -
-
@Anonymous: there is no difference if you are using a crappy old and blurry CRT that you bought for 10 dollars.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I'm still that 'guy' (I'm a girl), and the reason I wrote that was because the person who posted the sound quality test said you are "deaf" if you can't tell the difference. And I couldn't. Did it mean I couldn't tell good music apart from shit? No. Did it mean I didn't care for music? No. So, as a response, I clarified that I'm certainly not deaf, and the fact that I can't distinguish between 320kbps and 128kbps doesn't mean I'm an inferior music listener.
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I don't think anyone can make it any clearer for you: THIS IS THE INTERNET. NO ONE CARES
-
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Two things wrong with this:
1. Paying $70 for skull candy headphones
2. Listening to music on headphones that are only $7021 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
I only listen to new wax cylinder recordings. I find the warmth and authenticity superior to any digital media.
http://music.jeddavis.com/track/yuppie-exodus-from-dumbo-4-minute-indestructible-cylinder-mix -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@keigen_shu: I think YOU misunderstood.
320 is HIGHER QUALITY than 96.
HIGHER QUALITY. THE QUALITY is BETTER.
Are you really not understanding? -
@Anonymous: i know, I listen to mp3 anyway. I use spotify premium and it streams it in 320kbps if it's recorded that way. Anything else not there I just find the highest quality album..
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
All this arguing, and yet every single person in here has possibly the least reliable hearing device in human history, the ears. Seriously, by the time this argument is settled with on the internet, most of the people arguing it won't even be able to actually appreciate the bull shit they're supporting because their ears have worn down and can't process all frequencies of sound.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Michigan: Not sure if talking about old Mp3's or Skrillex
>shitty bass
>mid-range noise -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: HURR HURR HURR, I DON'T GET MODERN MUSIC SO I'M GOING TO MAKE AN IGNORANT JOKE ABOUT IT AND ALL THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO DON'T LIKE NEW THINGS WILL AGREE WITH ME DERPITY HURR DURR!
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: So you can't ear a difference so everyone doesn't ? Come on , if you listen to it on shitty headphones yeah probably but not on an hifi. Flac and lossless music in general offer you a more deeper sound than mp3 which erase some frequencies.
Dowload a vinyl rip 24 bits / 96khz and listen then to your spotify shit recording and tell me there is no difference. You're not an hipster, but you have some deep shit taste.
