-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: YOUR SIR DESERVE A MEDAL!!!
...
XD -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: I miss when trolling was a art.
Now its boiled down to
"This is my opinion."
"This is my opinion, as you can see its quite different from yours."
"Lol u mad I troll you, bro?"
Its not rage-inducing like the old days, hell its not even frustrating.
Its sad.
2 1 -
Anonymous
@totallybob: that's because you have developed anti bodies. didn't they teach you anything at homeschool?
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: whatever you say dude, I'm not the one using "X Y is X."
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
@totallybob: remember when "troll" had a specific meaning that only made sense in the context of forums and newsgroups?
I fear that soon, children will be running around throwing sand in each other's faces and yelling "LOL I TROL U" -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: how do you like my new meme
(first google result for "stock photo")1 1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Well, I could ask one of you to solve this, but I don't want to be a sticker beggar. I don't really care either, people had their laughs, that's the most important. Even the softest chuckle is worth more than the flashiest epic sticker.
~OP -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
Discussion about what trolling ought to be will be pointless when Arizona outlaws trolling.
http://techland.time.com/2012/04/03/arizona-looks-to-outlaw-internet-trolling/ -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Arizona is just defending the constitution by outlawing free speech, trying to break Roe v. Wade, enabling the police to demand identification, etc. etc.
Cool social policies, Republicans.
Honestly though, this will be pwned shortly after it is first executed, because it is an affront to the 1st ammendment.
Hurr durr, protect the contituion -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: You know, I hate it when someone gets two things right and one thing wrong ...
1 - Yeah, Arizona is being herrdurr with their no-trolling legislation and it will (and should) be struck down if it ever passes.
2 - However, a police officer can ALWAYS demand identification if they stop you for a crime (even speeding). Arizona wished to make it mandatory for their police officers to do so for the purpose of verifying citizenship during such crime stops. This was not an additional restriction of rights, but rather an additional burden on police officers using permissions already established to them in order to enforce laws already on the books.
3 - The abortion question cannot be legitimately answered without our society first agreeing upon the question of when life begins. There are anti-abortion persons who believe that moment is at conception and pro-abortion persons (including persons in Obama's cabinet) who believe a "fetus" can still be "aborted" up to 2 years after birth. It is my personal opinion that this issue will eventually resolve with the allowance of abortions during the first 3 months of pregnancy. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: "would make the failure to carry immigration documents a crime and give the police broad power to detain anyone suspected of being in the country illegally."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Terrible_Trivium: I thought it was obvious?
Oh, Poe's law. I had hoped it would be clear by adding "lelelelelelele" or the fact that it got some #1's. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous





