26 people remixing
Invite people to remix with you!
or
-
Anonymous
@Gearmond: So he should responsibility for articles Lew Rockwell wrote 20 years ago?
No, I actually don't smoke weed, but nice ad hominem. -
@Anonymous: lmao duh, its written for him/in his name/for his cause. lol @ trying to disassociate him with it, apologist.
yes because i'm 100% serious with literally no possibility of taking the piss out2 -
Anonymous
@Gearmond: You're grasping at straws over two decades old, good work.
And yes you were being serious, and you got called out on your bull shit. Deal with it. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: The majority of Ron Paul supporters are either:
-Too young to legally vote
-Locked up in a room somewhere trolling people on the internet
-Too high to know when to vote
This is why it has been over 20 years and Ron Paul never accomplishes anything.2 1 -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Secret possibility #4:
- Lives off the grid in a cabin with no electricity and hates government too much to vote at all.31 1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous:
Insulting people over the Internet and making false assumptions and fallacy filled statements is cool, rite guize?2 -
Anonymous
-
@Gearmond:
You're trying too hard, Gearmond.
I'm not RP supporter, but you have to learn when NOT to make ad hominem statements.
You're proving yourself to be the troll everybody makes you out to be.2 -
Anonymous
@Anonymous:
He made the prediction in 2003.
I know you're trying to make a joke here, but a joke has to be funny, first.2 -
@DragoniteVP:
>I'm not RP supporter
I forgot an "a" there or I made the "no" into a "not". Oh well, point is still there. -
Anonymous
@DragoniteVP: I didn't notice your mistake until you pointed it out. I think my brain inserted the "a" for me.
-
Anonymous
@DragoniteVP: yeah I don't like Role Players either, they creep me out a bit, but Gearmond needs to stop killing peoples' families, it's just terrible.
-
Anonymous
Ron Paul is a populist Right Winger who uses the national imaginary in a new modern form aimed at destroying liberal and workers movements to recreate the national community on ethno-cultural lines.
Populism. Right Wing. Nationalist. Modernist-reactionary. Racialism.
That's the long standing Marxist definition of fascism right there. Paul will only be elected if there is a strong enough workers movement that cannot be dealt with by traditional conservatism.*
The fact that Paul's racialism is centred in a "Race as Culture" concept like Admiral Horthy's Magyarist fascism, or to a lesser extent like Mussolini's fascism makes him no less racialist. The reconfiguration of the Spanish and Chilean communities around race during their fascist reactions was no less racial for not being about "blood." In fact, in terms of comparative US fascisms, we can praise Paul for moving away from blood-racialism and towards cultural racialism.
See Griffin's _Fascism_ or any major definitional text for the arguments surrounding fascism. But Paul's platform lies clearly within the fascist spectrum. The fact that Paul is a "left" fascist more concerned with state and market than race and blood does not alter his position in the political spectrum.
[*For seppos, please note that all terms used here follow their normal English meanings in Academic literature, and not your dumb fuck redefinitions of "liberal" and "conservative", but the ones that have remained constant since 1789] -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I'm glad someone recognizes the horrible mutilation our political language has undergone
-
@DragoniteVP: when not to: in a serious debate
when: in a clearly jesting manner making fun of Ron Paul supporter stereotypes.
GEE THANKS, GLAD I TOTALLY DON'T KNOW THAT. oops i do.
anyways i'm not a troll because i actually support what i'm saying. its just jokes, kids -
Anonymous
@Gearmond:
And these people are making fun of you for being a generic Ron Paul detractor/canv.as troll.4 -
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: so they're generic ron paul defenders on the internet? yeah, thats worthy of monocle stickers. (though what isn't)
anyways its cute that y'all think that anyone who disagrees with you is a troll. what is this, 9gag? -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
I've seen a Gearmond vs Paul thread before.
I can sum it up in this:
Paul prefers states rights. Gearmond lives in a locality that is so corrupt the federal government is literally more trustworthy then the local.
What may benefit your state and you with greater freedom and laws more fitting to your local culture, would leave Gearmond at the mercy of some rather corrupt local officials. A vote for Paul is essentially a vote to screw Gearmond.
When outside of politics he is an awesome guy though. Always posting with is screen name instead of posting anon and then claiming it when it gets stickered = ultimate internet badass. You gotta admire that. -
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: apparently said these things:
"Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
"We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."
After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."
One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."
Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."
hey i'm just the messenger -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: the only reason you don't hear about this is because you have to read about it, rather than watching youtube.
youtube is the new tv. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I like to take things that one person has and make it look like someone else said it, too! We should hang out.
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: That's so weird!
Because I was under the impression that "In 1996 when the Texas Monthly investigated the newsletters, Paul took responsibility for them and said that certain things were taken out of context."
You're right, though, I guess we should just pretend it never happened.
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-20/politics/30537102_1_newsletters-paul-campaign-conspiracy-theories
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: >Paul explained that he didn't actually write the newsletters but because they carried his name he was morally responsible for their content. Further, he didn't know exactly who wrote the offensive things and they didn't represent his views.
>morally responsible for their content
>didn't represent his views
>morally responsible for their content
>didn't represent his views
>flip
>flop
>flip
>flop -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Wait? What? Flip-flopping?
Oh you're right 0_0
Man what a jerk, that guy, saying those things and making millions of dollars for it. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: No GOP nom. means he sucks votes from the GOP nom. and re-elects barracks obamber
-
Anonymous
