98 people remixing
Invite people to remix with you!
or
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: What they think means literally nothing. Refusal is not probable cause and they can't execute a search based on that alone.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: No, they won't. If they did, the evidence they discovered would be unusable in court, and any lead the case follows after this point based on that evidence would be fruit of the poisonous tree and also inadmissible.
I seriously think you already know this, and are just bullshitting in an attempt to play devils advocate. -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: No, they do it all of the time. Evidence obtained illegally isn't thrown out of court nearly as often as you'd think.
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: you know that and I know that but the person they talk to does not always know.
That's why the cop tries to TRICK them into giving permission. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@noahvolek: When last I checked, a warrant is not needed to search a vehicle for obvious reasons.
-
Anonymous
-
@Anonymous: depends on the circumstances(traffic stop, its in your driveway, boarder crossing,etc) and where your from.
in canada...
never agree to a vehicle search. if cops search your car without your consent and they lack the legal justification(warrant or sufficient probable cause) to do so, any evidence they find can be thrown out in court. -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: no fat joke is overused, fatty ditected
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: PROTIP: The only laws that police officers are required to enforce are ones about child abuse, which they are obligated to report. Beyond that, it's up to the individual officer's discretion as to which laws to enforce and which to ignore. That's why plenty of cops don't give a shit about marijuana possession, and why quite a few cops don't care about people speeding. From the cops I've talked to, most police officers use laws as tools to protect people--that is, they enforce laws only when it helps protect people (e.g., pulling over drunk drivers that put other people in danger). Obviously it's not a universally held philosophy, but most cops, if they see you breaking a law that doesn't put anyone else in danger, will just ignore it or, at the most, ask you to knock it off.
tl;dr: You know nothing about how the system works, so take a break from reading blogs about Ron Paul and do some real learning.1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I read it. Worth it, since reading is easy since I'm not a candy-ass roody poo like midget-fapper up here -^
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: I was kind of with you until:
"Police don't become police because they have a passion for criminal justice. That's a load of horse shit. Police become police because they were the stupid bully in their class and they want to nurse their egos, wounded because of how stupid they were, by feeding their dopamine habits with a job that not only lets them continue to be stupid bullies but lets them do it with a sense of vindication and moral superiority."
Blatant generalization, which ruins the rest of your post (because your next paragraph goes on to build on it).2 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
