-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Demaster: it doesn't make any sense to label the picture as Republican.
Republicans have no affiliation and no agreement with the communist or national socialism (Nationalsozialismus or Nazi) movements.
I understand your thought process, you don't like Nazis and you don't like Republicans, thus Nazis must be Republican.
I know I'm feeding the trolls here, but I've gotta point out that idealistically, Democratic policies are *more* similar to national socialist or communist policies than Republican ones.
Just sayin91 1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Demaster: I wish I could FUCK YEAH your FUCK YEAH if you were making a Team America reference.
"Republicans FUCK YEAH" -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Demaster: Original: 1 sticker.
Remix: adds a single word, 187 stickers
canvas, what the fuck
1 1 -
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: well, that word wasn't in the original and people obviously find it noteworthy with the word added, so... yeah, you're kind of being an elitist right now.
21 -
-
Anonymous
The republicans that the picture is referring to are the ones that watch fox news and think new ideas are bad. They want nothing to CHANGE and force the government into a huge recession. while in this process, they blame it on the one democrat who is forced to fight with all of these RETARDICANS who can't see past their own wallets. This country needs a complete overhaul and Republicans are not the ones who are going to bring it.
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
@Anonymous: Also, this: http://www.usdebtclock.org/
I wish there was a way I could post it in real time so you all could see it. But the basic summary is this: bureaucrats, both Republican and Democrat, are screwing your grandsons harder than this guy with their wasteful spending. -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: If we relied on the kind of people who, for example, worked at Enron to do the jobs typically performed by government employees, your mail would be on fire every morning for a week prior to a new service option appearing in your contract. That service option, "Mail not on fire" would cost roughly 400% of the original terms.
If Mass Transit ran the way private companies are allowed to run ISP companies, not only would the busses not run on time but you'd be paying the equivalent of a bus a month to share your ride with that guy who masturbates to child pornography on the seats.
There are things that the private sector is good at, like providing services to self-selecting groups.
Providing services to the general public is not on that list.
I do not have a clever picture for this. -
Anonymous
@Anonymous: You don't have any facts to back that up. UPS and FedEx are doing well while the USPS is in bankruptcy. Publicly owned apartments are generally always in very poor condition. Profit motive makes people work hard and be productive.
-
Anonymous
Enron fraudulently called California power stations and told them to shut down in the summer, causing the state to experience blackouts instead of rolling brownouts, and then selling their own electricity back to them at a markup that would, I assume, stagger you, since you clearly don't recall this.
I also have to assume that someone else pays for your internet, since you've obviously never had dealings with an ISP.
UPS and FedEx provide a specialized service, and you pay for that premium. The USPS gets it there for everyone. Privately owned apartments are also often in terrible condition, and nothing you've said actually provides a counterargument to anything I've said. Let me repeat.
Private companies are good at providing service to a client base.
They are not good at providing service to everyone. Building roads and sewers and taking a postcard from bumfuck, Illinois to gatortaint, Louisiana is not a profitable business. These things do, however, have to be done in a civilized society, and that's WHY WE HAVE A GOVERNMENT. It is EXPLICITLY for those things no one group can afford to pay for, or wants to pay for, but which provide for the common good.
Do you think, by the way, that FedEx and UPS would be doing half as well as it is if their trucks didn't have an interstate highway system to drive on? Or airports in every major city to fly into and out of? Or someone watching the skies at each airport to make sure the planes didn't ram into each other?
Someone, I should point out, that they don't have to bribe, just as the cost of doing business, because otherwise the private Air Traffic Controller, Inc employee gives priority to FedEx's competitor who DID think to set up a slush fund or whatever other bullshit loophole applies?
You DO NOT JUDGE a government program's success by whether it's PROFITABLE. You judge it by whether it ENABLES OTHER THINGS to be profitable or effective.
Repeat after me:
The governm…3 -
Anonymous





