@SarahPalin: I know this: we need to play with existing stuff to get new stuff. I do it too if I have something to add or mutate. I'm fine with most everything that gets uploaded to canv.as, within the CoC. My specific issue would be two fold+
- pre-generated crap from other sites with the urls clearly displayed
- the advice thing is soooo overdone as to part of the background, trite and booring.
plus this in particular and the atheism thing has been bubbling up all day. do something new, find some other creative way to push your agenda.

@blblnk: for the record, transhumanist and staunchly agnostic. I'd be more than happy to discuss the relationship between deceit and human religious institutions in controlling people and power anytime, but not here.

@blblnk: You staunchly agnostic about the existence of fairies, unicorns and Santa, too?

@Olly: There is no documented, verifiable, and replicable evidence of such things that I'm aware of, but I try to keep an open mind.

@Anonymous: Like most of the people here, I didn't click the fucking "follow button".

Like most people, I go to the front page to sticker a meme or make my own; What I see, is that the whole fucking front wall is covered in these stupid advice god memes that are just as ignorant as the people that made them.
And like SarahPalin, you guys are just using the bible's ignorance to be ignorant of what is actually in the bible and what most of those things actually mean.

@Anonymous: Yeah, but now you're just pushing the incest back a generation. These images only give you limited space to work with, of course some liberty is going to be taken with the details. The overall point made by the image is still the same.

@Anonymous: It's not okay to apply contemporary laws to past events, but it's fine to apply archaic laws to current events?

When there is a feuture that allows me hide all posts in a certain group in my Everything, then I'll use it. Now you just propose me to manually mark as followed all the groups except this one. Well, no. And why on earth create group when you are not ready that someone might not like it?

@Anonymous: you sound lazy

@Anonymous: in other words you are weak, either for being a bad christian, a bad liberal, or a bad paganist

@Anonymous: My point is that most people go on to Canvas for fun.
At first, I thought the whole "Atheist group" was ok, and I still do; but I don't like it when people are filling the forum with shit, old shit memes that have gone out of style. I do also want to see groups that I am not wanting to follow, just for the sake of free choice.

You are advocating spam in the guise of the freedom to post. I am not trying to take your freedoms away or limit them, but nobody likes spam.

@Anonymous: Don't like a site's content? Go to a different site.
No one's forcing you to look at these images.

@AnimalCrosser5: Again, read the Book before making any bloody statement. You'll die. Isn't it enough?
Anyway. All I wanted to say is that this paticular image is simply flawed. It is. Get over it.

@Anonymous: No, apparently death isn't enough, since your God would also send me to roast eternally in hell.

@Anonymous: I am a Christian, because I believe in a messiah that gave us a choice, gave us a consequence, and gave us a way to redeem ourselves.

I believe in and support homosexuality, because it is something that is natural, and because I believe a God that judges the heart and the intent.

I am a secular pagan, because I believe that some traditional means of medicine and comfort can be goodly and non-conflicting with my beliefs.

@AnimalCrosser5: I know, 70 years of being evil shouldn't warrant an infinity of pain and suffering.

@Anonymous: Link me to the study so I can verify its validity.

@AnimalCrosser5: I pray He won't.

@Anonymous: World religious demographics:
90% theist
3% atheist.

It's funny how only 3% of the world's population can account for the most noisy and annoying.

@SarahPalin: >Also i never said i haven't read the bible, i just don't think people have to read it to have an opinion on it.
Now that's simply illogical. Herp-derp, I ain't need to know no thing 'bout them evilutions 'cause I know it's wrongedy-doo.

@SarahPalin: I agree it sounds silly.

An ignorant person, from a scientific point of view, is usually a person who made a decision without considering ( ignoring ) all the evidence for the respective case

@Anonymous: your math is wrong... where's the other %7. you must account for that before your argument has any validity